Handguns - Latest Reports

Pistols

Walther PPK .380 ACP...
Hi-Point Model CF .380 A...
Bersa Firestorm 380 ACP,...


Revolvers
Specialty

Long Guns - Latest Reports

Rifles
Shotguns
Specialty

Special Purpose Guns - Latest Reports

Home Defense
Surplus/Collectible
Law Enforcement
Concealed Carry
Hunting
Recreational
Competitive

Ammo

Accessories

Gun News

Gun Rights
Industry Notes
New Products
Competitive
People

Special Reports

Understanding the Not-So-Simple Drill Bit

They may be familiar to some, but not every gunsmith knows the ins and outs of drill bits. Here are the basics.

Repairing the L.C. Smith Hammerless Double

The graceful, light, and distinctive L.C. Smith Hammerless Double sidelock is a favorite of American shotgunners. Here’s how to fix its most common problems. If you own a Smith and want to make it suitable to shoot again, or if you are presented a Smith to repair, here’s what you need to know about the shotgun.

Commentary

SHOT Show Video: Two Big-Hole Wheelguns from Kahr Arms

In June 2010, Kahr Arms purchased Minnesota-based firearms manufacturer, Magnum Research, Inc., maker of the Desert Eagle Pistol and BFR Revolvers in .44 Magnum, .45 LC/.410 or .45/70. Kahr Arms offers a selection of other niche-type firearms, such as the “Tommy Gun” and Auto-Ordnance line of M1 .30 caliber carbines. In this video, Gun Tests Contributing Editor Roger Eckstine shows off two of the company’s big-hole BFR wheelguns.

SHOT Show Video: Easy Disassembly for the Modular Beretta Nano

Beretta USA introduced the BU-9 Nano as its entry into the pocket 9mm pistol category last September. Initial shipments of the American-made pistol left the Accokeek, Maryland factory beginning in November 2011, with a suggested retail price of $475. In this video, Gun Tests’ Contributing Editor Roger Eckstine gets a detailed explanation of how easy the Nano is to break down for maintenance. The Nano's modularity provides for simple disassembly and easy cleaning. Safely disassemble the pistol by first engaging the striker deactivator, a patent pending safety mechanism that eliminates the need to pull the trigger prior to disassembly.


Beretta Cheetah 84 LS .380 ACP, $652

Gun Reports Home >> HandgunsSEARCH GUN REPORTS

Beretta Cheetah 84 LS .380 ACP
Courtesy, Gun Tests

This is an easier-to-handle subcompact version of the Beretta 92 series pistols in 9mm Short. It has more class and charm than heavier recoiling polymer pistols.


From the 11-01-2002 Issue of Gun Tests

Classification:Handguns
Category:Pistols
Model Name:Cheetah
Manufacturer:Beretta
Model Number:84 LS

Printer Friendly | Email |

Smaller guns have always had a certain appeal. In some cases it was just the aspect of miniaturization that captures our imagination. In other cases it was the reassurance of a highly concealable weapon. One niche of such guns were semi-auto .380s, which have long been popular sidearms because of their flat, short footprint and sufficient, if not outstanding, power.

Even in the small world of 9mm Shorts there is a pecking order in terms of size, with the Beretta 84LS being one of the largest.

This would account for the most sight radius, barrel length, the most generous grip area, and the highest capacity, (10+1). This model line starts with an MSRP of $576 for a blue finish with plastic grips, but ours cost $652 with wood grips and nickel finish. We bought ours at Fountain Firearms in Houston, (281) 561-8447, www.fountainfirearms.com.

The finish had a burnished hue that matched the beautifully checkered grips. The classic “PB” (Pietro Beretta) insignia was inlayed on the left grip panel. Appearance and handling may appear to be identical to the 92 and 96 series Beretta pistols, but the Cheetah operated by a blowback system rather than locked breech. But what was most important was that there were no malfunctions of any kind.

The frame was an alloy that made a plastic-like click when we tapped it with a fingernail, but the top end was steel. While the 84LS weighed the most of our quartet of pistols at 25 ounces, this was only 3 ounces more than the considerably smaller North American Arms Guardian. The Cheetah 84LS was completely devoid of any sharp edges, and even with a top end busy with a variety of levers, we found holstering and presentation to be snag free. The safety and decocking levers were blended into the profile and did not interfere with racking the slide. Rear cocking serrations were plentiful.

The two supplied magazines matched the frame and offered two windows for checking loading status at 5 and 10 rounds. The base pad was heavy polymer and did not add to the front strap. Breakdown of the magazine to mag-body, spring, and follower was a simple procedure of depressing the base pad retainer and sliding off the pad. This revealed a stout spring and polymer follower encased in a hard steel body. We felt the price of this pistol reflected quality construction that carries over to accessories such as the magazines.

The trigger mechanism was traditional double action, with the first shot double action followed by single action fire. The Cheetah 84LS will not fire unless the magazine was in place, but we did have a great deal of trouble locking the slide back unless an empty magazine was in place. We attributed this to the way the slide release was blended into the grip profile. This lever was easily accessed for downward motion to release the slide, but difficult to get underneath and push upward

Beretta Cheetah 84 LS .380 ACP
Courtesy, Gun Tests

Without the top end in place, the 84LS frame looks like Berettas locked-breech pistols.


to set the lock. After chambering a round, the gun can be fired single action, or the hammer can decocked by pushing the safety upward. This lever was ambidextrous. Leaving the safety/decocker lever in the upward position also disconnects the trigger. Lowering it to the firing position made the trigger ready for a double action first shot.

It was possible to raise the safety to a position half way up leaving the hammer back. But, this did not create a single-action cocked and locked state of readiness. Depressing the trigger will not fire the gun but will instead activate the decocker, drop the hammer and disconnect the trigger. At the range we found the transition from double to single action to be smooth, which in some measure was a product of the comfortable hand position which did not tempt the shooter to readjust one’s grip between shots.

In terms of 15-yard accuracy, the Cheetah M84LS shot the only 1.0-inch group of the session, and it had an average just under 1.9 inches for all groups fired. We credit this to an above-average trigger and sights that offer a clear view of the light bars created by the front and rear sights but also a dot on the front sight that mates visually with a defined area in the rear notch. The Beretta also produced the most velocity from each test round and average muzzle energy measured 195 foot-pounds firing the Federal American Eagle 95-grain FMC round. This was 11 foot-pounds higher than its next competitor.

With its double-column design assuring maximum capacity and wide grip frame offering maximum control, the Cheetah 84LS was not the most concealable weapon, But it did offer the kind of ergonomics that smaller-handed shooters will appreciate. It had all the accuracy, reliability, and capacity of the full-sized Beretta 92, but in a more manageable package.

Though .380 ammunition was in some cases more expensive than its 9mm big brother, we found Hornady’s 90-grain XTP hollowpoint to be economical (20 rounds for $11.95 retail). The Cheetah handled our choice of hollowpoint ammunition with ease and comfort. With many good frangible rounds also available in .380 Auto, we feel the viability of this pistol for self-defense deserves

The Beretta Cheetah M84 LS .380 Auto, $652, was an Our Pick. This was an easier to handle and easier to hide version of Beretta’s signature pistol, the model 92. While the .380 was not a big stopper, the Cheetah was still a higher capacity option with more class and charm than heavier recoiling plastic guns.

digg this reddit submit Newsvine DEL.ICIO.US

READ FULL GUN REPORT
READ RATINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ON GUN TESTS



Reader Comments

My Kimber ulta carry wieghs 25 oz. Why would I by this gun?

Twice the ammo capacity? Lower recoil? Cheaper ammo? DA/SA trigger?

For that matter, why not carry a P32, if weight is your only criterion.

Yet another outdated report since the M84 LS is no longer made. Current .380 from Beretta is 84 FS. Some of the review's comments may or may not apply to the newer model and I have yet to see a LS on the used market. But the 84 FS is a class gun based on my 50 rounds through one and in nickel it is a beautiful thing, but for the money the Bersa .380 is a better buy at less than 1/2 the price of the 84 FS.

Price is too high Try a Bersa in 380

I have not tried the Beretta, but have owned two Bersas. The transition to SA trigger required me to change my grip, or it would double. No more for me. I suspect the Beretta would not have that issue.

How come it has a double stack magazine but, it only came with a Politicaly correct Clinton 10rd mag?? If memory serves me well, it should have a 15rd capacity. Check the Berreta web site.

My first gun was the blued SF version of this pistol. It was very accurate and quite reliable. They are beautifully made and I believe there is still a version with a tip-up barrel. That version is very helpful to the elderly defender because the user can simple tip up the barrel and place a round in the chamber. Then close and latch the barrel and insert the magazine and the defender has 14 rounds of .380 ready to go without having to rack the slide. I finally sold mine due to the scarcity of .380 ammo at the time. Since then there are chambered in 9mm, .40S&W and .45 that carry much smaller than the Cheetah. I now carry a Glock M27 and have stuck with that as my carry pistol ever since.

Look at the CZ 83 to compare price and size.

Makes. No. Sense. There are way more size appropriate .380's, if you want a 25 ounce pistol, you would be just as well off shooting 9mm. For the price you can get a 9mm and a .22 to practice with.

Meh. I'm waiting for the .32 version.

a big .380 is like a fast harley. got no use for either. perhaps italians have a love for big, underpowered pistols.

meh. -tom

Sometimes I wish I was Italian and not British, I mean come on, they have it all Beretta,Benelli,Donzi,Ducati,Ferrari,Lamborghini, Olive Garden lol Seriously, Beretta is top notch.

But they don't have Porsche or the Doge Viper.

With so many "real" calibers available in similar and even smaller sized pistols, it is hard for me to imagine why I would carry such a pistol. My standard carry guns are at least 9mm, but most of them are .40 or .45. I also like the .357 Sig. My .380s are Ruger's LCP, Kel-Tec P3AT, and North American's Guardian .380.....all of the .380s serving in the role of back-up pistols to my other "real" caliber guns.

I recently picked up a like new Browning .380 BDA, a Beretta-made pistol based upon the 84 but with the ambi decocker mounted on the closed-top slide. It has a really fine bright nickle finish and beautiful walnut grip panels. It is quite accurate and both fun and easy to shoot. It is too big for a .380 by today's standards, and not enough gun for standard hip carry, not even counting the shiny finish. All that said, for hip carry I normally carry at least 9mm and preferably .45 ACP. For pocket carry I use a Ruger LCP, and before that a Kel-Tec P-32, both using marginal rounds, but one little one in the pocket is better than nothing when hip carry isn't appropriate. So, why did I acquire the Browning-Beretta? Because it is a beautiful, well-designed, and finely-made pistol which is a delight to possess, own, and then shoot now and again. If I could have only one handgun, this probably would not be it. But as a pretty, I am glad I have it and likely will die with it still in my possession. As an old and long-time married guy, I cannot indulge myself with a different beautiful girl every day, but I can fondle a different beautiful gun whenever I get the urge. Some things are worth having in this life simply for the pleasure they bring.

Very eloquently stated, Jon

I detect from JonSE's post that he and I are likely kindred spirits when it comes to our choices of firearms. As I stated in my post of 11 February, my only use for the .380s in my collection is in the role of back-up to my major caliber pieces that I always carry on my strong side hip. That said, I do appreciate the little pistols, and they have respected places in my overall collection of firearms.

I no longer shoot as much as I used to, but I still get a lot of satisfaction and pleasure from simply handling, working the actions, and periodically cleaning all of the weapons in my collection. I was once told by a dedicated collector that I was not really collecting as much as I was accumulating firearms. His rationale was that because I do not concentrate on a particular make and/or model of firearm, my collection is an accumulation. Well, OK, I can go with that. However, with four safes plus numerous other pieces hanging on walls and in other locations around my home and in my automobiles, I still feel like I am a collector. The idea is that I acquire what interests me so I can play with my "toys", and for those that I particularly like as defensive pieces.....well, those are the ones with which I maintain proficiency for the purposes of concealed carry.

One of my great pleasures is in attending gun shows, seeing what interests me, and if possible, purchasing that piece. It's all part of what we are guaranteed by the Second Amendment.

Make sure you remember me in your will Col. Novack, I'll call it a collection!

A beautiful gun but one wonders, WHAT FOR? Today there is a plethora of more powerful 9mm and .40 and 45acp guns of the same size.

A beautiful gun but one wonders, WHAT FOR? Today there is a plethora of more powerful 9mm and .40 and 45acp guns of the same size.

A beautiful gun but one wonders, WHAT FOR? Today there is a plethora of more powerful 9mm and .40 and 45acp guns of the same size.

hymmmn, i was a Glock enthusiast, for years! Carried, a Glock 19, [15, in the magazine, one, in the "Throat"]. [Berreta's, have a tendancy to stovepipe, ie., older 92f model], bought the new, at the time, Springfield .45 XD, this weapon[ 13 in the magazine, another in the chamber. Taking them both, to the range to shoot, 250 rounds thru each; 146grain hollow point, "Black Talons", in my Glock; 250 grain hollow points, in my Springfield.

The recoil, between the 2, was incredibly, minimul!... I was amazed! I don't care to shoot another,[i will, if provoked to defend myself]; and, i'd much rather shoot with the stopping power of a .45 caliber, than any other! especially, with such a light recoil!... And the Springfield, is American made...[they've been making weapons, for the United States Army, since the time of George Washington! My other carry gun, is the "New", Taurus Judge Revolver, .45 long colts, and .410, ooo buck shot!... 5 shots, no waiting!...never can jam! Any "Attacker", would have about 2 chances, coming up, against this Gun!...[Slim & None!...]. Be Safe, and Stay Alert!... Captain George Dowling


To post a comment you must be a registered user of gunreports.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to gunreports.com

Login to gunreports.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?

Register and Post Comment
*Fields marked with an asterisk are required.

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?