Handguns - Latest Reports

Pistols
Revolvers
Specialty

Long Guns - Latest Reports

Rifles

ArmaLite AR-10T 308 Win....
Remington R-25 308 Win./...
Fulton Armory Titan FAR-...


Shotguns
Specialty

Special Purpose Guns - Latest Reports

Home Defense
Surplus/Collectible
Law Enforcement
Concealed Carry
Hunting
Recreational
Competitive

Ammo

Accessories

Gun News

Gun Rights
Industry Notes
New Products
Competitive
People

Special Reports

Converting Old Browning Model A-5s

Newer versions of this famous shotgun use roll pins instead of screws to hold certain action parts. Here’s how to convert early Auto-5s.

Glock Mods: An M1911 Man Branches Out

I’ve worked with the 1911 for many years, and sometimes that experience has been helpful with other pistols, such as the Browning Hi-Power, for example. Sometimes the differences between pistols are hard to spot, and other times we find similarities between handguns that at first seem very different. Another example: If you can work on the Savage 1910, you can work on the Astra 400, and you won’t be confused by the H&K P7M8. But the Glock? Ah, the Glock is an altogether different creature. Sometimes my 1911-based reasoning produces positive results with the Glock, and other times it does not. With the Glock so popular with law-enforcement and now proving itself in competition—winning the first top-class award at IPSC—we’re going to see more and more Glocks turned in for improvement. And at the very least, we should be familiar with the similarities and the differences between the Glock and “old Slabsides.”

Commentary

Semi-Annual FBI Report Confirms Crime Down As Gun Sales Up

The FBI's semi-annual uniform crime data for the first half of 2013 confirms once again what the firearms community already knew, that violent crime has continued to decline while gun sales have continued to climb.

GunBroker.com Names January 2014's Best Selling Firearms

GunBroker.com has released its list of Top 5 best-selling firearms for January 2014, topped by Smith & Wesson's M&P semi-automatic pistol.


H&R 1871 Ultra Hunter No. SB2-808 308 Winchester

Gun Reports Home >> Long GunsSEARCH GUN REPORTS



Although there's nothing fancy here, this U.S.-made rifle got our respect. About all we'd change would be to get the trigger about 2 pounds lighter. This is solid value in a no-frills rifle, and we came to like and respect it.

From the 10-01-2010 Issue of Gun Tests

Classification:Long Guns
Category:Rifles
Model Name:1871 Ultra Hunter
Manufacturer:Harrington & Richardson
Model Number:No. SB2-808

Printer Friendly | Email |

The concept of a single-shot rifle for modern usage goes back quite a few years. Despite the advent of repeating firearms, the single-shot rifle has always held its own, from the Sharps down to the H&R Ultra rifle tested here. Many makers have put together some very fine and also some not-so-fine single shots on a great variety of actions. We acquired one of the U.S.-made H&R 1871 Ultra Hunters in 308 (SB2-808, MSRP $374). We tested the 308 with three types of ammunition, Remington 180-grain Core-Lokt, Winchester 150-grain Power Point, and Winchester Supreme 168-grain HPBT match. Here’s what we found.

Harrington & Richardson, currently owned by Remington, still makes its guns in the U.S. Our 308 Ultra came with a sturdy laminated stock with a durable finish, thick but firm recoil pad, matte blued metal, and a 22-inch medium barrel. This was a no-frills package, though the stock was quite attractive with its non-glare finish and decent checkering. The gun opened by a press-down button to the right of the hammer. Opening and closing the action was a bit stiff, but it loosened somewhat during our test sessions. The barrel had a rail for Weaver-type bases, secured with three Torx screws. No scope rings were provided.

Not much came with the rifle but a padlock and a hammer extension for scope use. No sling, no scope rings. The instructions told us to be sure to mount the hammer extension before installing a scope. We tried, but failed. The 8-32 threaded hole in the extension was not tapped cleanly all the way through. We had to run a tap in there and only then could secure the extension to the hammer.

The hammer operated through a striker bar that was raised by pressing the trigger. The rifle could not be opened if the hammer were cocked, but it was possible to cock the hammer with the rifle open and then close the rifle on the cocked hammer. Because the rifle cannot fire unless the trigger is pressed, the latter situation is not as alarming as it might otherwise be.

We could not help but notice the stock felt clumsy in the controlling hand. The pistol grip was big and fat and not to our liking. We’re sure the H&R is very strong, and if you don’t like



We had a little trouble with the hammer extension, but got it mounted. It is reversible, so the rifle is ambidextrous. A low-powered, light scope sight would make this into a superb all-around rifle, wherever a single shot is appropriate.

the stock you can opt for a thumbhole stock, for slightly extra cost. The company website (www.hr1871.com) indicates you can get a thumbhole stock on the blued Ultra test rifle, but doesn’t give prices for anything.

The metal finish throughout had a brushed look, or the result of surface grinding. This was pleasant, and provided a matte surface for the excellent bluing. The forend iron and trigger guard were hard polymer. The forend wood was finished internally, and was fitted around a stout stud that was spot welded to the bottom of the barrel. This stud accepted the single large Phillips-head screw that secured the forend to the rifle. The trigger pull was clean but way too heavy at 6 pounds.

We mounted our Leupold 16x tactical scope and headed to the range. We began with the Remington ammunition, and made some three-shot groups of around 3 inches. The Winchester 150-grain did better, around 2 inches. Finally the match ammo gave us the smallest group of this test, 0.7 inches, with an average of 1.4 inches. This rifle shot all three types of ammunition respectably, if not majestically. The trigger was a terror, and it needed to be several pounds lighter. We wonder how much better we might have shot with a better trigger.

Our Team Said: We thought the rifle needed an ejector, though picking the empties out of the H&R was a bit easier than with the CVAs. Some might want a mushier recoil pad, but we liked what was on it, and particularly liked the excellent fitting of the pad to the stock. Although we liked the feel and looks of the Apex and even the Scout more than the look of the H&R, we would buy this rifle over them in light of its reasonable performance. We thought it was a solid, sound rifle that didn’t ask for much, and gave plenty of performance for its modest cost.

digg this reddit submit Newsvine DEL.ICIO.US

READ FULL GUN REPORT
READ RATINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ON GUN TESTS



Reader Comments

My understanding is that, unlike most manufacturers, H&R does not stress-relieve the barrels of their rifles.

I haven't shot the 308 but have shot H&R's version chambered in 45 Colt. 50 yard accuracy through factory installed irons with mild lead reloads was superb, 50% better than my 45LC Rossi lever action. The 45 Colt version for a range toy. Is great way of sharpening one's shooting skills with iron sights. Guns, like tires, you get exactly what you pay for. The economical cost of the entire H&R line are all simply an excellent value. Paper targets never return fire or run away so an immediate follow up shot is never necessary.

I'm still anxiously awaiting the arrival of H&R's 45/70 Buffalo Classic. If you see the Buffalo Classic available via Davidson's jump on it as they go quick. I got the email notification from Davidson's early in the morning while I was at work. By the time I got home to place my order they were all gone.

I own this rifle, or variations of it in calibers from .17MachII all the way up to .30-06, with about about seven different ballistic variations along the way. It has become my only hunting rifle of choice, even though I have a safe full of other options. It is so nice to be able to get a receiver set up the way you want it, including some trigger polishing if you like, and then just change out the barrels to suit the conditions or game du jour. I will often select the .30-06 for brush stalks for deer, then switch to the .270 should my afternoon hunt take me to a stand that overlooks a broad open field. I even have different scopes on my two .30-06 barrels to allow me to fine tune my gear to the conditions, game, and field of fire. I LOVE these guns. The only trouble I have ever had is with the ejector on one barrel, and I'm pretty sure it's dirt down in the ejector hole that I have not gotten out yet. Never a misfire, and I've never needed the second shot.

Ed Clark

I got 3 of these: A 45-70 wood stock, Iron sights, 17HMR, wood, straight stock, peep sights, and a .223, wood stock, Reflex sight. Each has it's own personality, and I love them all. They have grown to be my favorite guns, and all shoot extremely well. I do like the old beaver-tail fore-end over the newer design though.

have 4 handyrifles.had problems with one in 7X64 Bren.--would not eject. returned to company and advised I was using Rem 175 grn ammo. a month later I got it back stating they replaced the ejector and polished the chamber (it was blued inside and still blued when returned). Fired cases still would not eject. Overlooking the blued receiver/deciever crap I emailed them and asked what kind of ammo they test fired. I was advised PMC, Federal, and Hornady. Called Federal to locate a dealer that would carry this caliber and was advised they had not made 7X64 in 20 years. I called Hornady and they advised they had never ever made 7X64. By now Im pissed and called H&R service dept and the then Manager hung up on me. A letter to the CEO was not answered. I waited about 5 years and sent the rifle in again but did not mention the earlier fiasco. It was returned in good working order and no BS about polishing the chamber. This transpired about 2001-2006. All my rifles shoot reasonably well especially the 45/70 which is exceptional.

I bought one of these sleepers decades ago (Handi-rifle - same except walnut stock with schnaubel forend) in 30-30 to complement my Winchester 94. Reloaded my own spire point bullets (carefully segregated from the 94 ammo!) and got amazing accuracy out to 300 yds, which is really pushing a 30-30. Liked it so much I sent the receiver back to H&R to be fitted with .357 iron sighted barrel and a .223 which is bored in the same blank creating in effect a heavy barrel. At the same time they offered to do a trigger job at no extra charge - something to do with a youth marksmanship program they supplied rifles for way back then where it was part of the standard prep. Pull is now a clean 2 lbs. The .357 is an outstanding centerfire plinker and a great training piece for a newbie, but the .223 has never lived up to my somewhat lofty expectations. The experimentation with different loads may occupy me for many years. This article has me thinkin' about getting it fitted with a .308 barrel, hmmm...

Mauser Fan, was your 7x64 Bren rifle equipped with an ejector? Not all Handi-Rifles are equipped with ejectors, some have extractors. While an ejector forcibly removes the spent shell, an extractor only pushes the shell out far enough so it can be grasped and manually removed.

I have a 270, 45-70, and now a 35 Whelen. I too had problems with the 270 with the shell extractor. Sent it in, it came back no change. I traded it off on another one that doesn't have the problem. Great and "handy" rifles.


To post a comment you must be a registered user of gunreports.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to gunreports.com

Login to gunreports.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?

Register and Post Comment
*Fields marked with an asterisk are required.

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?