GunReports.com publishes the detailed ammo-testing protocol from Gun Tests magazine, the most commonly requested addition to Gun Tests coverage. Gun Tests' focus is on performance before the bullet hits the target. 'We realize that results from our test gun can’t be extrapolated to every possible gun readers might own, we wanted to test ammunition in a fashion most consumers would be able to duplicate, and in fact, should conduct on their own. But our framework can potentially save you money and time by narrowing the list of candidates you might try in your own gun, and you can also follow our system to see if a given round performs for you like it did for us.

GunReports.com shows how to excess headspace in the 1903 and ’03A3 Springfield rifles better than the way Granddad did it. If you have access to a lathe, use this method to correct excess headspace easily, without the need for an expensive chambering reamer.

(GunReports.com) — From Gun Owners of America (GOA), a non-profit lobbying organization formed in 1975 to preserve and defend the Second Amendment rights of gun owners: Write your representative one final time. Tell him to oppose the Senate-passed ObamaCare bill ... Remind him that, once Obama and Senate Democrats have gotten what they want, there is no incentive to ignore the Senate rules... You can use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center to send a pre-written message.

GunReports.com now has a Facebook page. Keep abreast of what's going on minute-by-minute on breaking gun news, harmful gun legislation, firearms victories by becoming a Facebook Fan of the page. Look for 'Gun Reports' on Facebook. Also, for inside peeks into Gun Tests' ongoing criticism of firearms, search Facebook for 'Gun Tests'

Exclusive community benefits are yours, free!

Kimber Model 84m Montana

Courtesy, Gun Tests

We liked this rifle. The concept of a hard-hitting caliber in a light rifle makes sense for most hunting applications. Accuracy was entirely adequate, and recoil was insignificant thanks to the excellent stock design and excellent recoil pad.

The first thing we noticed was this was a very light rifle. Without scope it weighed under 5 pounds. The second thing we noted was the recoil pad was excellent, a model for the rest of the industry. The straight Kevlar/carbon fiber stock was dark gray in color and had enough of a pebble-like surface that checkering wasn’t needed, even when wet. There were no visible parting lines on the stock, and the barrel, though free floated, was so close to the stock it was not easy to see the separation.

The action was like a small pre-’64 Model 70 Winchester compete with cone-shaped breech, controlled feed, and positive ejection. A neat push-button on the left rear of the action permitted bolt removal. The safety was again just like the early pre’-64 Winchester Model 70. It had three positions, the middle permitting the cycling of the bolt to empty the magazine. In fact there was no other way to empty the loaded magazine, the rifle having no floorplate. The magazine held five rounds but it was not possible to close the bolt over the fifth, nor could we easily cycle the first round out with five in there, so we called it four-plus-one. Feeding and ejection were for the most part slick and easy, getting better as we used the rifle.

All the metalwork was matte stainless. Kimber didn’t use aluminum to cut weight, just made the parts smaller. The action is smaller than normal in all dimensions, yet much stronger than needed. The magazine follower was plastic, but all the rest of the innards were of steel. The slim barrel helped cut weight. We were cautioned to be sure to let the barrel cool between shots on hot days to get the most out of the rifle. Barrel twist rate was one turn in 10 inches, same as the other two rifles.

The rifle came with dovetail-style bases, but we changed them to Leupold’s own two-dovetail setup to make sure our relatively heavy (1.35 pounds) new 30mm 16X Leupold Mark 4 test scope would stay put. This brought the empty weight up to 6.5 pounds. If this cartridge were ever going to hurt the shooter, this was a setup that would do it. Not much to our surprise, the Kimber had no significant felt recoil. The slight kick from the straight stock was sharp and fast, and no trouble at all, thanks to the great pad.

Three .338 Federal loads are flanked, left, by the .338 Win. Mag with 250-grain Core-Lokt, and by two

Courtesy, Gun Tests

The Kimber Montana's action was like a shrunk-down Winchester pre-64 Model 70, complete with cone-shaped breech, controlled-feed extraction, and a superb trigger, even better than the Sako's. That stock is Kevlar/carbon fiber, and glass bedded.

A more suitable, lighter, hunting scope would easily give a carrying weight well under 6 pounds. That would increase kick somewhat, but we don’t believe recoil will ever be a problem with the excellent Kimber stock design.

Clearly, Kimber has shown that manufacturers can reduce the weight of hunting rifles if they use a design that directs recoil straight back, not upward against the face. Please note, manufacturers, that there are in fact good recoil pads out there. The one on the Kimber worked exceptionally well. By contrast the pad on the $1600 Sako was as soft as a brick and difficult to change. The Ruger’s pad was even worse. It makes little sense for a factory to install a useless recoil pad on a too-heavy rifle. Cut the weight, use a good pad, and sell more rifles.

Be advised sharp, fast recoil can play hob with scope mounts on heavy scopes, or even with the scope itself. To reduce the possibility of problems with your scope or mount, we suggest using the lightest and highest-quality scope possible mounted by an expert in either double dovetail rings, or in the very simple yet extremely rugged Weaver bases and rings. The Weavers may not be pretty, but they have performed well for us here for many years on many rifles.

The Kimber’s best results were with the 185-grain Barnes X load, which averaged about 1.2 inches. In over-90-degree heat we shot slow and very slow, and we even shot fast, but saw little change in group size. Our smallest three-shot group was fired in cooler weather, a cluster of the 185-grain Barnes-X bullets that went into half an inch. In hot weather the barrel got mighty hot. The Kimber is not designed for long strings from the bench. Clearly this rifle is made for lots of easy carrying followed by the occasional shot. We tried fast pairs, and got generally excellent results, the two landing 1.0 to 1.5 inches apart. What more could you want?

Reader Comments

So you can mention the price point on a competitor, but not on the subject of the story. Nice. (insert roll eyes smilie here) There is no picture of the rounds as intimated in the text. Do you not even attempt to edit your story from Gun Tests?

Comment by: Markbo | October 30, 2008

well written article ,as I own a montana in 270 wsm and it is a tack driver and extremely well built for the money.Marc G.

Comment by: darth vader | October 30, 2008

Nice article, But what's the cost & what calibers are available???

Comment by: MARK T | October 30, 2008

Great article. have a 84 in 308. wouldn't trade for the world. With light mags,a great choice for elk to 300 yds. Got mine used(couldn't tell!) for $800.Under 6lbs w/vxlll 2.5/8.Great gun.Leaving tomorrow for elk camp. hope to use it again, but a joy to carry nonetheless. Bob

Comment by: Robert L | October 30, 2008

Thanks for the post on price point, I agree it should have been mentioned in the article,hoping this was simple oversight on editor/author and not a "trend".Hoping McNuggets makes it to the WH.Regards to all. Thom

Comment by: THOMAS P HALLIGAN | October 30, 2008

Thom... this is a trend that I have noted and remarked on here several times. I got some canned response about 'the differences in price around the country not showing a realistic number'. BS. If it is clearly stated what the MSRP is, we can figure out street price, but on a new gun we need a reference

Comment by: Markbo | October 31, 2008

I agree completely- case in point Ruger's LCP w/ MSRP $330- Central Fl. dealers asking $499 @Sept.shows, currently seems to be $400-$450 dealer ask. I find GB.com to be a reasonable barometer for pricing. Seems like lots of dealers inflate their ask to provide percieved discount. I think an MSRP while not always the "market" beats the heck out of no price at all. Thanks for the reply Thom

Comment by: THOMAS P HALLIGAN | October 31, 2008