Gun Reports - News
The EPA has denied a petition calling for a ban on the production and distribution of traditional ammunition.
EPA Denies Petition Calling for Lead Ammunition Ban
September 1, 2010Printer Friendly | Email |
(GunReports.com)-- Following a strong grassroots campaign led by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has denied a petition calling for a ban on the production and distribution of traditional ammunition.
Steve Owens, EPA assistant administrator for the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, issued the followingstatement on Friday, "EPA today denied a petition submitted by several outside groups for the agency to implement a ban on the production and distribution of lead hunting ammunition. EPA reached this decision because the agency does not have the legal authority to regulate this type of product under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) -- nor is the agency seeking such authority."
Soon after NSSF's call to action was posted Wednesday at nssf.org, it went viral. Hundreds of blogs and websites linked to it. More than 5,000 people shared it with friends on Facebook, and the message also spread across Twitter, forums and other sites. As a result, hunters and shooters across the country made their voices heard, submitting comments to the EPA and contacting their lawmakers.
"This is a tremendous victory for all sportsmen, hunters and gun owners, said NSSF President Steve Sanetti. As the trade association for America's firearms and ammunition industry, NSSF is thankful to the tens of thousands who answered our call to action and made their voices heard. This victory belongs to them."
Reader Comments
This is also a victory for those who oppose government agencies over-reaching their authority, regardless of the consequence and cost to taxpayers.
This is not the first nor the last oblique movement to nibble away at our 2nd amendment rights. I don't believe they'll come at us head on, it'll be very subtle like this was. Anyone remember the new DMIL code for military brass that was also reversed last year? I believe there will be more attempted bans on firearm related items that will appear innocuous at first glance. "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you"
Glad the EPA backed off on this, but how is it they can regulate lead sinkers but not lead bullets? Shouldn't the TSCA either cover lead in both uses, or not in either? I don't quite get that. Am I going to have to start using old spark plugs to go fishing now?
|
An Important Note for GunReports.Com Readers: Our goal on this website is to foster a free expression of views while reining in language that crosses the line of civil discourse. Accordingly, the comments areas are intended to expand the knowledge of all users of this site. But site administrators wish to discourage the use of profanity, insults, disrespect, the advocacy of lawlessness, violence or sedition, or attempts to impinge on the rights of others. While GunReports.Com encourages robust discourse that furthers our understanding of all the issues affecting gun owners, comments that break GunReports.Com’s rules will be removed. In addition, we reserve the right to edit or delete individual comments, and in extreme cases, to ban commenters at our discretion. --Tim Cole To post a comment you must be a registered user of gunreports.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to gunreports.com
|



