Handguns - Latest Reports

Pistols
Revolvers
Specialty

Long Guns - Latest Reports

Rifles
Shotguns
Specialty

Special Purpose Guns - Latest Reports

Home Defense
Surplus/Collectible
Law Enforcement
Concealed Carry
Hunting
Recreational
Competitive

Ammo

Accessories

Gun News

Gun Rights
Industry Notes
New Products
Competitive
People

Special Reports

Replacing Missing Firing Pins

Don’t give up if a replacement firing pin is unavailable from your catalog suppliers. Instead, use these tips to solve the problem.

Gun Tests Index 2011-1999

Here are all the items tested in Gun Tests magazine from 2011 back through 1999.

Commentary

Media Matters Doesn't Really Matter

The group Media Matters for America hates NRA. Few organizations have more strongly proclaimed their disdain for our right to keep and bear arms and self-protection, says the NRA-ILA.

Video: What to Do During a Traffic Stop

Lethal Force Institute’s Massad Ayoob gives a lesson on what to do if you are stopped with firearms in your vehicle. These essential tips will teach you how to safely interact with police when carrying a firearm while driving. (3:47).


Gun Reports - News

Gun Reports Home >> News

Blue Trail Range in CT Wins Lawsuit, Stays Open

July 25, 2011

Printer Friendly | Email |

(GunReports.com) – The Connecticut Superior Court has just issued a decision ending the sensational and contentious lawsuit brought by Durham land owner Pasquale DiNatale against Blue Trail Range of Wallingford, ruling in favor of the shooting range on all counts.

Blue Trail’s owner David Lyman says the range has suffered over the years due to the plaintiff’s unsubstantiated claims and all-out media war. “This decision is such a relief,” he said.

The Lyman family has a long and distinguished history in the shooting sports and has always made safety its highest priority. Blue Trail prides itself on being one of the safest rifle ranges in the nation.

Lyman said, "At last, we can refocus on doing what we do best: advancing the shooting sports, coaching junior teams, and operating a premier shooting range for law enforcement and private shooters.”

Blue Trail was defended by the Law Offices of Martha A. Dean, supported by Craig Fishbein of the Fishbein Law Firm, LLC. Attorneys Dean and Schindler of Dean’s law firm successfully defended Metacon Gun Club, Inc. of Simsbury in state and federal court in recent years. Both the Dean and Fishbein law firms are committed to the advancement of safe shooting practices and protection of our constitutional right to bear arms.

Says Dean, “Blue Trail Range is finally free of the dark cloud cast over it by uninformed and negative publicity and duplicative lawsuits.” She continued, “The judicial system provided a forum for a fair, systematic, and thorough examination of the evidence. Quite simply, the evidence did not point to Blue Trail as the source of bullets at issue.”

digg this reddit submit Newsvine DEL.ICIO.US

Reader Comments

For those unfamiliar, there is a mountain between the range and the home of the plaintiff in question, and at least a mile of distance. It was always clearly about harassment, especially as the plaintiff is allegedly a property developer.

Without questioning the merits of the case, it should reinforce to all of us the importance of range safety. Civilian ranges and sportsman's clubs, especially in well-developed areas like the North East, rely explicitly on no one allowing a gun to discharge unless it is pointed at the target. It's all too easy for some yahoo to create headaches for the rest of us by shooting off a string of uncontrolled fire that, although it may be fun, greatly increases the odds that a projectile will leave the facility.

Allegedly, DiNatale (plaintiff) is a hunter who hunts on his own land as well as a parcel he donated to Durham, with the clause that hunting thereon be reserved for him and his family. Developer? I don't know, but obviously a tad better of than many "Nutmeggers" if he can donate land. The Lyman name (range owner) seems to be prominent in that area as well.

Also interesting is that the "down-range" mountain is part of a park open to the public for hiking, but not hunting. Frankly, in a past life, that mountain would be considered part of the impact area.

I remember a case from a few years ago, also from CT, I think, where a woman called police to report that bullets from a nearby range were impacting her property. When the police showed up, she showed them a complete, unfired 30-06 round that she claimed she found in her pool. She actually lived up range, behind the firing line, but she was a chronic complainer about the noise.

Gaviota

I fear that with the encroachment of high density population areas moving ever further from the original boundaries of what used to be called "urban sprawl", we will see more difficulties such as this. While we all would like to have as much range time as we can get, we may find ourselves travelling further and further from home to get that range time. When I was in high school, a friend of mine had a basement range that was constructed using what appeared to be six inch pipe that ran from the inside wall of his basement to the end of the property line in his backyard. Neighbors never complained, and I doubt that any of them knew that we were firing some pretty high power stuff in there. While we did attempt to ventilate the basement, I am still somewhat amazed that we didn't end up with some form of lead poisoning or some kinds respiratory ailments.

I point out the basement range idea, because we may find that enclosed ranges may be one small part of a solution to the pending shortage of range lands. Of course, such ranges will require considerable financial outlay in order to qualify for health and safety standards..... AND, there will likely be some die-hards who will attempt to throw political barriers in the path of such development. BUT, it seems that nothing is simple anymore.....

caonvack - I agree completely; that's why I think range safety is becoming more important all the time. Most civilian ranges wouldn't stand a prayer of being approved on any military base. In the military, the assumption is that rounds will be going where they shouldn't, so we create a huge "impact area" to compensate. Civilian ranges make the assumption shooters always keep the gun pointed in a safe direction and always keep their finger off the trigger until ready to shoot. The costs to mechanically contain any errant round would easily shut down all but the wealthiest private clubs, so it behooves all of us to be exceptionally considerate of the neighbors.

Using silencers helps to appease the neighbors, where allowed. I've heard that silencers are much easier to obtain in Europe for exactly that reason.


An Important Note for GunReports.Com Readers:

Our goal on this website is to foster a free expression of views while reining in language that crosses the line of civil discourse. Accordingly, the comments areas are intended to expand the knowledge of all users of this site. But site administrators wish to discourage the use of profanity, insults, disrespect, the advocacy of lawlessness, violence or sedition, or attempts to impinge on the rights of others.

While GunReports.Com encourages robust discourse that furthers our understanding of all the issues affecting gun owners, comments that break GunReports.Com’s rules will be removed. In addition, we reserve the right to edit or delete individual comments, and in extreme cases, to ban commenters at our discretion.

--Tim Cole
Publisher, GunReports.Com

To post a comment you must be a registered user of gunreports.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to gunreports.com

Login to gunreports.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?

Register and Post Comment
*Fields marked with an asterisk are required.

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?