Gun Reports - News
AP: Memphis LE Source of Guns From High-Profile Shootings
March 14, 2010Printer Friendly | Email |
(GunReports.com) A recent AP story pushed the angle that removing used police firearms from resale channels is good public policy, citing heavily criticized Miami police chief John F. Timoney as a reliable source on the topic and offering no balancing opinion.
Then the story attempted to link the resale practice as part of a trend of loosening gun laws throughout the South.
The AP angle was that used police guns resold to the private market led to two high-profile shootings this year at the Pentagon and a Las Vegas courthouse. Both guns came from the police and court system of Memphis, Tenn.
The story said, "Law enforcement officials told The Associated Press that both guns were once seized in criminal cases in Memphis. The officials described how the weapons made their separate ways from an evidence vault to gun dealers and to the shooters."
Then the story continued, "The use of guns that were once in police custody to attack police officers highlights a little-known divide in gun policy in the U.S.: Many cities and states destroy guns gathered in criminal probes, but others sell or trade the weapons in order to get other guns or buy police equipment.
"In fact, on the day of the Pentagon shooting, March 4, the Tennessee governor signed legislation revising state law on confiscated guns. Before, law enforcementagencies in the state had the option of destroying a gun. Under the new version, agencies can only destroy a gun if it's inoperable or unsafe. "Kentucky has a similar law, but it's not clear how many other states have laws specifically designed to promote the police sale or trade of confiscated weapons."
Had the AP asked practically anyone in the gun-wholesale business or the NSSF, they'd have learned that most state don't regulate the practice of LE gun resale. Those decisions are usually made at the local level, and may vary inside states.
Then the story tried to associate the LE policies with many states--24, according to the story--with the general loosening of restrictions on private ownership of guns.
"A nationwide review by The Associated Press in December found that over the previous two years, 24 states mostly in the South and West, where gun-rights advocates are particularly strong have passed 47 new laws loosening gun restrictions. Gun rights groups are making a greater effort to pass favorable legislation in state capitals."
This is an intellectually dishonest linkage, and was either an attempt by AP to tie improved gun rights to the two shootings or incompetent reporting. GR readers can make their own decision about which option is true.
Read the entire story here.Reader Comments
Last time I checked people kill people, guns do not do it on their own. Really, in the hands of a criminal it makes a difference as to the history of a gun? Did the gun have a checkered past? Its unfortunate that John Q. Public usually believes these stories and agrees with tougher gun laws. What a waste destroying a perfectly good gun. With logic like this its hard to imagine why these big cities are going broke.
This is an intellectually dishonest linkage...
Oh, ya think? When has the AP ever run a gun story that wasn't riddled with dishonesty? Thanks for the fisking, but everyone with more than five living brain cells (that aren't tagged for breathing only) knows that AP stands for "Authorized Propaganda."
Gaviota
Isn't the AP now owned by Rev. Moon and the "Moonies" - along with the Washington Times?
Yeah - AP truthful? That'll be the day!
Timoney is one of those anti-gun "top-cops" who feel they should be able to represent all of law enforcement.
"Many cities and states destroy guns gathered in criminal probes, but others sell or trade the weapons in order to get other guns or buy police equipment." Many people put their old stuff in the trash; others sell it on e-bay....
Mr. Timoney and AP are hoping that your average Oprah watching, People Magazine reading American will think to herself, "Those shootings happened because guys got ahold of police guns". In fact purchasers of police resale guns are subject to the same background check (NICS) as other gun buyers. Assuming the Pentagon and Las Vegas shooters acquired their police resale guns legally, they could have purchased a non-police gun as well.
From what I recall reading, their acquisitions may have fit the classic "straw purchase." The AP article and Timoney have no interest in getting the truth out there.
The antis are jumping the shark on this one! They couldn't wait to tie police re-sale of guns to "loosening gun laws," yet the guns in question came from "police custody." That means they were most likely STOLEN from a police evidence locker! Cops seem to have a nasty habit of leaving duty pistols in bathrooms or restaurants, losing automatic rifles and somehow "misplacing" evidence. If you or I were that careless, we'd be in jail! This controversy isn't about crime. It's a TACTIC. They're fooling no one.
I'm pretty sure the guns were sold legitimately by the PD to a distributor/dealer.
|
An Important Note for GunReports.Com Readers: Our goal on this website is to foster a free expression of views while reining in language that crosses the line of civil discourse. Accordingly, the comments areas are intended to expand the knowledge of all users of this site. But site administrators wish to discourage the use of profanity, insults, disrespect, the advocacy of lawlessness, violence or sedition, or attempts to impinge on the rights of others. While GunReports.Com encourages robust discourse that furthers our understanding of all the issues affecting gun owners, comments that break GunReports.Com’s rules will be removed. In addition, we reserve the right to edit or delete individual comments, and in extreme cases, to ban commenters at our discretion. --Tim Cole To post a comment you must be a registered user of gunreports.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to gunreports.com
|



