Gun Reports - News
Supreme Court Citizens United Decision Supports Free Speech for Gun-Rights Groups
February 1, 2010Printer Friendly | Email |
ST. AUGUSTINE, Fla. -- An editorial in the Historic City News recapped the importance of the Supreme Courts recent Citizens United verdict to the national gun-rights battle:
The National Rifle Association of America Institute for Legislative Action reported praise for the Supreme Courts decision last Thursday in the case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
The ruling removes restrictions on NRAs ability to speak freely at election time.
The late Sen. Paul Wellstone said, during the original debate over this legislation, that it was his intention to silence groups like NRA. While the author of this measure had singled out NRA, this law delivered a clear message to all American citizens: Keep your mouths shut and stay out of our political debates.
NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre, said, This ruling is a victory for anyone who believes that the First Amendment applies to each and every one of us. The majesty of free speech is that any American can roll out of bed and speak as freely as The New York Times, NBC or politicians. This is a defeat for arrogant elitists who wanted to carve out free speech as a privilege for themselves and deny it to the rest of us; and for those who believed that speech had a dollar value and should be treated and regulated like currency, and not a freedom. Todays decision reaffirms that the Bill of Rights was written for every American and it will amplify the voice of average citizens who want their voices heard.
The case originally centered on the Federal Election Commissions denial of Citizens Uniteds attempt to broadcast a film about Hillary Clinton through on-demand cable services in January 2008, but had broader implications in protecting the First Amendment rights of organizations like NRA during elections.
NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox, said, This decision today returns sanity to our political system. The First Amendment does not allow Congress to make laws denying Americans the right to speak out on issues, the right to assemble or organize on public policy issues, or the right to petition our government for redress of grievances.
Although the NRA sounds like they are gloating, somewhat, over their victory it is a victory that they needed to have.
The National Rifle Association is a promotional or single-issue group interested in gun laws but they are no different than other cause or attitude groups that seek to influence public policy in a particular area. Environmental groups such as Greenpeace, senior advocacy groups like the American Association of Retired People and groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, which is an animal rights group, all tend to be aligned toward a political ideology and they all seek influence in specific public policy areas.
The voice of these organizations is the voice of their constituents they need to be heard in the political process to the extent that they are able to advocate for their members.
To read the entire story, click here.
Reader Comments
"The late Sen. Paul Wellstone said, during the original debate over this legislation, that it was his intention to silence groups like NRA."
Is there any reason whatsoever to re-elect ANY of these reptiles? The corruption just goes on, and on, and on...
Gaviota
Nope. We need to vote them all out.
There is a very big downside to this ruling - yes, "we" get a voice through NRA-ILA, but now George Soros and his ilk can shove their opinions down our throat, too.
Let us all be conscious that if the Second Amendment is restricted, reduced or otherwise neutered, the First Amendment is also doomed. The only thing standing in the way of those who espouse the views of the idiot Senator and likewise, the filthy rich idiot George Soros are those who support and defend the Second Amendment. Liberals will always paint themselves as open to all ideas, beliefs and opinions, UNTIL YOU DISAGREE WITH THEM!!! Then, you turn into a hate monger, homophobe or other such miscreant. They are always politically correct and you are of cave man mentality (meaning no disrespect to cave men and women everywhere). Always keep in focus that it is NOT about gun rights or even free speech, its about CONTROL.
|
An Important Note for GunReports.Com Readers: Our goal on this website is to foster a free expression of views while reining in language that crosses the line of civil discourse. Accordingly, the comments areas are intended to expand the knowledge of all users of this site. But site administrators wish to discourage the use of profanity, insults, disrespect, the advocacy of lawlessness, violence or sedition, or attempts to impinge on the rights of others. While GunReports.Com encourages robust discourse that furthers our understanding of all the issues affecting gun owners, comments that break GunReports.Com’s rules will be removed. In addition, we reserve the right to edit or delete individual comments, and in extreme cases, to ban commenters at our discretion. --Tim Cole To post a comment you must be a registered user of gunreports.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to gunreports.com
|






