Handguns - Latest Reports

Pistols
Revolvers
Specialty

Long Guns - Latest Reports

Rifles
Shotguns
Specialty

Special Purpose Guns - Latest Reports

Home Defense
Surplus/Collectible
Law Enforcement
Concealed Carry
Hunting
Recreational
Competitive

Ammo

Accessories

Gun News

Gun Rights
Industry Notes
New Products
Competitive
People

Special Reports

Replacing Missing Firing Pins

Don’t give up if a replacement firing pin is unavailable from your catalog suppliers. Instead, use these tips to solve the problem.

Gun Tests Index 2011-1999

Here are all the items tested in Gun Tests magazine from 2011 back through 1999.

Commentary

Media Matters Doesn't Really Matter

The group Media Matters for America hates NRA. Few organizations have more strongly proclaimed their disdain for our right to keep and bear arms and self-protection, says the NRA-ILA.

Video: What to Do During a Traffic Stop

Lethal Force Institute’s Massad Ayoob gives a lesson on what to do if you are stopped with firearms in your vehicle. These essential tips will teach you how to safely interact with police when carrying a firearm while driving. (3:47).


Gun Reports - News

Gun Reports Home >> News

Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colorado, has worked to help peacefully resolve issues between the Forest Service and gun owners.

Udall works to bring Pittman-Robertson funds to ranges

September 26, 2011

Printer Friendly | Email |

(GunReports.com) -- Hunters, recreational shooters and other gun owners pay an 11 percent excise tax, established under the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act of 1937, on ammunition and other hunting and shooting equipment. It generates more than $700 million each year that is supposed to establish, restore and protect wildlife habitats and provide for hunter education. That means gun owners pay a tremendous amount toward maintaining and improving public lands, such as our national forests and properties governed by the Bureau of Land Management.

Bikers, hikers and other enjoy these lands and benefit from taxes that are paid only by shooters.

So how does the federal government repay the gun owners? By shutting down shooting ranges in national forests with every excuse they can find. Both forest shooting ranges near Colorado Springs have been closed for years. Federal authorities claim the ranges are dangerous, even though they are statistically far safer than all other recreation facilities in the forests. They claim the ranges are poorly maintained, which results from willful neglect by the National Forest Service. When asked to reopen and provide reasonable oversight and maintenance of the ranges, National Forest Service officials claim poverty.

Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colorado, has worked to help peacefully resolve issues between the Forest Service and gun owners. In June he introduced SB1249, known as the Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Support Act. Udall hopes the bill will get a hearing in the Environment and Public Works Committee. A companion bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on Friday.

The Udall-inspired bills would amend the Pittman-Robertson Act to allow proceeds of the tax to fund up to 90 percent of expanding or constructing shooting ranges on federal or nonfederal land.

Read more here.

digg this reddit submit Newsvine DEL.ICIO.US

Reader Comments

I'm supportive of this idea. In fact, I think we should include other users of national forests and other lands in some kind of licensing scheme which would also put money into the Pittman-Robertson monies for wildlife and sports management. Hikers, picnicers, shroom hunters, bird watchers, beachgoers - they should all be paying for access with the funds going to pay for maintenance and management of the facilities and resources they use. For someone who wants to hike / bike in the forest most weekends, a user tag that costs the same as a general small-game license shouldn't be too high. It would help maintain their trails.

I agree David; however, I see potential for the unintended consequence that with additional sources of revenue from hikers, botanists, and hippie communes, the importance of our duck stamps decreases and conceivably becomes replaceable.

P V B - gosh, I sure hope not. That would be terrible.

Yes it would...


An Important Note for GunReports.Com Readers:

Our goal on this website is to foster a free expression of views while reining in language that crosses the line of civil discourse. Accordingly, the comments areas are intended to expand the knowledge of all users of this site. But site administrators wish to discourage the use of profanity, insults, disrespect, the advocacy of lawlessness, violence or sedition, or attempts to impinge on the rights of others.

While GunReports.Com encourages robust discourse that furthers our understanding of all the issues affecting gun owners, comments that break GunReports.Com’s rules will be removed. In addition, we reserve the right to edit or delete individual comments, and in extreme cases, to ban commenters at our discretion.

--Tim Cole
Publisher, GunReports.Com

To post a comment you must be a registered user of gunreports.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to gunreports.com

Login to gunreports.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?

Register and Post Comment
*Fields marked with an asterisk are required.

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?