Handguns - Latest Reports

Pistols
Revolvers
Specialty

Long Guns - Latest Reports

Rifles
Shotguns
Specialty

Special Purpose Guns - Latest Reports

Home Defense
Surplus/Collectible
Law Enforcement
Concealed Carry
Hunting
Recreational
Competitive

Ammo

Accessories

Gun News

Gun Rights
Industry Notes
New Products
Competitive
People

Special Reports

Replacing Missing Firing Pins

Don’t give up if a replacement firing pin is unavailable from your catalog suppliers. Instead, use these tips to solve the problem.

Gun Tests Index 2011-1999

Here are all the items tested in Gun Tests magazine from 2011 back through 1999.

Commentary

Media Matters Doesn't Really Matter

The group Media Matters for America hates NRA. Few organizations have more strongly proclaimed their disdain for our right to keep and bear arms and self-protection, says the NRA-ILA.

Video: What to Do During a Traffic Stop

Lethal Force Institute’s Massad Ayoob gives a lesson on what to do if you are stopped with firearms in your vehicle. These essential tips will teach you how to safely interact with police when carrying a firearm while driving. (3:47).


Gun Reports - News

Gun Reports Home >> News

Rep. Joe Walsh’s legislation will cut U.S. funding to the UN if the international body imposes any restrictions on Americans’ gun rights.

Rep. Walsh to UN:
No Gun Control Treaties

December 4, 2011

Printer Friendly | Email |

(GunReports.com) -- Representative Joe Walsh (R-IL) has drafted a bill that would block U.S. funding to the United Nations if it seeks to implement gun control measures affecting U.S. citizens.

Despite victories by gun owners in elections and legislative battles throughout the country in recent years, on the international front gun control is moving quickly.

Most significantly, in 2012 the UN plans to release a final draft of the Arms Trade Treaty—a treaty that will have severe consequences for American gun owners.

Meetings are held behind close doors, but from information gathered by Gun Owners of America, we believe that the ATT will, at the very least, require gun owner registration and microstamping of ammunition.

The ATT will define manufacturing so broadly that any gun owner who adds an accessory such as a scope or changes a stock on a firearm would be required to obtain a manufacturing license.

It would also likely include a ban on many semi-automatic firearms (like the Clinton gun ban) and demand the mandatory destruction of surplus ammo and confiscated firearms.

President Obama, not surprisingly, welcomes the treaty. He knows that he is unlikely to get such radical proposals through the Congress, so the UN provides him a backdoor way to enact gun control.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is also on board and began pushing for the treaty as soon as she was confirmed in her position. “The United States is prepared to work hard for a strong international standard in this area,” she said.

Since treaties must be ratified by the Senate, GOA is working continually to buck up weak-kneed Senators who might be pressured to ratify the treaty.

But the House, which controls the nations’ purse strings, can also play a role in killing the ATT (or any other anti-gun treaty, for that matter).

Rep. Joe Walsh’s legislation will cut U.S. funding to the UN if the international body imposes any restrictions on Americans’ gun rights.

This is a huge deal, because without the contributions of the United States, the UN would be crippled financially. According to government reports, U.S. taxpayers foot the bill for 22 percent of the UN’s regular budget and 27 percent of its “peacekeeping” budget.

American gun owners, in other words, are funding the organization that wants to do away with the Second Amendment!

Rep. Walsh is putting the UN on notice: back off our gun rights.

Entitled the “The Second Amendment Protection Act of 2011,” Rep. Walsh is now seeking original cosponsors to join him in the House. He plans to introduce the bill within the next week.

Rep. Walsh highlights for his House colleagues the necessity of his proposal, noting that:

  • It is the constitutional power of Congress to determine United States foreign policy through the ratification of international treaties;
  • U.S. Presidents, by signing on to treaties, have opened the door for international organizations to unilaterally regulate the lives of citizens of the United States;
  • International and transnational organizations force their rules on people of the United States through conventions, multilateral agreements, and nonratified treaties, such as agreements that affect the private ownership of firearms by law-abiding citizens; and
  • United States sovereignty is risked by domestic legal applicability of international treaties and executive agreements that have not been voted on and congressionally adopted through formal processes.

digg this reddit submit Newsvine DEL.ICIO.US

Reader Comments

“The United States is prepared to work hard for a strong international standard in this area,” Hillary Clinton said.So,Since is Hillary "The United States"? Don't speak for me Hillary!

And I am prepared to work hard to see charges of TREASON brought against anyone who supports, votes for, or signs such a treaty. Any of that would be an outright violation of our Constitutional rights, and that is 'giving aid and comfort to our enemies' via disarmament, right guys?

While we may take a degree of comfort in the threats by a large number of US Senators, that such a treaty will never be ratified, there remains much concern in the progress that this bit of diplomacy is taking. Of one thing we can be sure..... If any Clinton fingerprints are to be found on anything, we can figure that there will be some sort of anti-Second Amendment twist to it.

I recently saw a news bite on TV that said that, if elected president, Newt Gingrich would select John Bolton as his Secretary of State. While Newt may not be our favorite GOP candidate, I surely do like his choice for SecState.

Sadly for conservatives, Newt changes his mind faster than my second wife with PMS. NOT the kind of guy you want for POTUS, and definitely not for the guy with 'the button' on his desk - at least not to my thinking. Not only that, but the campaign promise that gets you to vote for him may be forgotten BEFORE you vote!

The entire field of GOP candidates leaves me somewhat uninspired, however, with that in mind, who ever gets the nomination will definitely get my vote. The mere hint that Obama might get a second term scares the hell out of me.

Amen that!


An Important Note for GunReports.Com Readers:

Our goal on this website is to foster a free expression of views while reining in language that crosses the line of civil discourse. Accordingly, the comments areas are intended to expand the knowledge of all users of this site. But site administrators wish to discourage the use of profanity, insults, disrespect, the advocacy of lawlessness, violence or sedition, or attempts to impinge on the rights of others.

While GunReports.Com encourages robust discourse that furthers our understanding of all the issues affecting gun owners, comments that break GunReports.Com’s rules will be removed. In addition, we reserve the right to edit or delete individual comments, and in extreme cases, to ban commenters at our discretion.

--Tim Cole
Publisher, GunReports.Com

To post a comment you must be a registered user of gunreports.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to gunreports.com

Login to gunreports.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?

Register and Post Comment
*Fields marked with an asterisk are required.

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?